The U.S. Treasury sanctioned major Ethereum mixing tool Tornado.
Only fairly recently have we seen probably one of the most important news connected to cryptocurrencies and privacy come out. At the beginning of August, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Ethereum mixing tool Tornado Cash.
Through this step it essentially made usage of this tool completely illegal for any U.S. citizen. However, the consequences of these sanctions are far more reaching than just Tornado Cash. Many have already stated and shown that due to this step, the U.S. Treasury has essentially violated freedom of speech. How? That is what we will explore today.
Tornado Cash is an Ethereum mixing tool that provides services to all the users who chose to do so without discrimination based on location. Tornado Cash has established itself as one of the most prominent mixing tools that was outside of the world of Bitcoin. It is estimated that over the years the total transaction volume connected to the platform topped more than $7.5 billion.
On 8th of August the U.S. Treasury with its agency’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Tornado Cash to the sanction list. Moreover, OFAC also added about 45 addresses (current reported numbers are 38 ETH addresses and 6 USDC addresses) to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) list, essentially banning all Americans and companies from interacting with the given addresses. Due to this, not only the addresses but also the protocol’s website and its associated smart contracts are blocked.
The U.S. Treasury stated that this was due to the repeated failure of Tornado Cash to impose effective controls designed to stop it from laundering funds for malicious actors. The statement from Treasury also said that it estimates that over $7 billion dollars was laundered through this tool, essentially classifying every transaction that took place through Tornado Cash as an attempt to launder money.
According to the official statement, this decision came about mainly to stop North Korean criminals who are connected to the Lazarus Group Axie Infinity hack worth $600 million. The supporters of this decision believe that North Korean criminals connected to this hack have used Tornado Cash to launder the stolen money through it. The investigation by the FBI has been ongoing since April and hinted even before that Tornado Cash might be subject to regulatory action.
Several cryptocurrency and technology companies were very quick to impose some controls in face of this new announcement. For instance, Roman Semenov, one of the co-founders of Tornado Cash, reported that GitHub, one of the most popular developer platforms, suspended his GitHub account following the news. What is worrisome is the fact that Semenov was not named in the Specially Designated National list, yet got suspended from the platform anyways.
Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, was also fast to react to the sanctions and blacklisted addresses on the given list without any explanation. According to estimates this means that the blacklisting of the USDC addresses will freeze an amount of about $75 000 that belongs to Tornado Cash users.
While this feels like a coordinated attack that was planned ahead, not everyone is on board with this step. On the contrary, several cryptocurrency companies and lobbyists have already expressed their support for Tornado Cash and freedom of speech. As many noted, Tornado Cash is nothing more than just a neutral tool (in the form of a written code), which means that sanctioning it like this has no place in a free society.
Semenov himself expressed his concerns immediately after being suspended by GitHub by asking a very simple question:
“Is writing open-source code illegal now?”
Many agree with his wondering. For instance, Jerry Brito, executive director of Coin Center, stated that this step has nothing to do with sanctioning the illegal actors or criminals. He specified:
“It is not any specific bad actor who is being sanctioned, but instead it is all Americans who may wish to use this automated tool in order to protect their own privacy while transacting online who are having their liberty curtailed without the benefit of any due process.”
Jake Chervinsky, head of policy at Blockchain Association, also believes that the U.S. Treasury has crossed a line with this step. Nicholas Gregory, CEO of CommerceBlock has elaborated more on this topic by stating that this step does not prevent criminals from continuing in their illegal activities. He believes that criminals will be criminals and will thus find a way to go around these measures.
“The ban on Tornado Cash makes little sense, because in the end, no one can prevent people from using other mixer smart contracts or forking the existing ones. It neither hinders cybercrime, nor privacy.”
Only a few weeks back has Tornado Cash officially announced that it has fully open-sourced its user interface code. This was to move towards the goal of complete decentralization and transparency.
While Tornado Cash is predominantly an Ethereum mixer, the logic behind the sanctions put forward can be simply connected to Bitcoin and its mixers. If the U.S. Treasury or any other regulatory agency in the U.S., or, in fact, around the world, does not like what the given tool is doing, they can make it illegal.
Tornado Cash was nothing more than a tool itself. While it was used for cryptocurrency mixing, which is associated with higher transaction privacy, the regulators did not provide any concrete evidence of proving that Tornado Cash did indeed help with “laundering $7 billion.”
The morality of the cryptocurrency mixers, whether they should be legal or illegal, is something that we have uncovered previously. However, the main point of the wrongdoing of the regulators is that they are essentially banning the tools they do not like and most probably do not understand.
Tornado Cash, just like any other cryptocurrency mixer, is just a software, a neutral tool. A tool just like a phone, car or internet in the essence that it does not inherently do anything good or bad, right or wrong. It only provides services that the users can exploit in any way they want.
Thus, it cannot be stated overall whether this tool is good or bad. Just like one cannot state that with a phone, car or internet. All of these tools are used daily not only for positive things, but also for negative. The same logic can be applied to mixers.
One of the most popular Ethereum mixers is thus in serious trouble in the United States. But so is the freedom of speech, since tools such as Tornado Cash are nothing more than a code, which should be considered speech.
If you do not want to dabble into Ethereum and many tokens built around it, but want to still maintain financial privacy which is a crucial human right, feel free to use Whir to send Bitcoin privately.
Disclaimer: This article does not serve as a piece of financial advice or encouragement and inducement for the usage of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Its primary role is informative, explanatory, and educational. The readers have to decide themselves whether to use or not to use these types of services.
We all know that Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous, meaning that even though they don't directly reveal the real-world identities, they still leave a trail that can potentially be traced back to the users. This fragility of privacy poses significant risks, as once compromised, it can be difficult, sometimes very costly, or even impossible to recover. Let's find out more about CoinJoin, a privacy protocol designed to eliminate these privacy concerns.
Imagine you're walking down a crowded street, and every step you take is being recorded. Every conversation you have, every move you make is recorded and later analyzed. It's like living in a fishbowl, where your every action is on display for anyone with the right tools to see. That's the reality for everyday crypto users on heavily monitored blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
What are the risks associated with the use of Chainalysis tools in legal proceedings? Despite the purported effectiveness of Chainalysis tools, the lack of scientific validation, the opacity of the methodologies, and the erosion of financial privacy and legal rights are very significant concerns. Bitcoin mixers, particularly in obscuring transaction histories through protocols such as CoinJoin, highlight the limitations of Chainalysis' tracing capabilities.
